Free C2090-632 sample questions
Real questions from the IBM Cognos 10 BI Metadata Model Developer practice bank, with the correct answer and an explanation for each one. No junk, no filler.
Try them in the simulator Same questions, with study, timed and flashcard modes.
Showing 10 of 20 free sample questions.
A healthcare provider needs to build a Framework Manager model for analyzing patient outcomes. The security requirements are stringent and complex, based on a user's role and their assigned medical facilities. **Data Structure:** - A `PatientEncounters` fact table contains sensitive patient data and a `FacilityID`. - A `Doctors` dimension table includes `DoctorID` and `DoctorName`. - A security table named `DoctorFacilityAccess` maps `DoctorID` to the multiple `FacilityID`s they are authorized to access. **Security Requirements:** 1. A logged-in user, who is a doctor, should only see patient data for the facilities they are assigned to in the `DoctorFacilityAccess` table. 2. The user's `DoctorID` is available via a session parameter `loggedInDoctorID` populated from the authentication source. 3. The solution must be scalable and avoid hard-coding values. It should be applied centrally to a security group named `DoctorGroup`. Which of the following represents the most robust and maintainable implementation of this row-level security requirement?
True or False: In Framework Manager, changing a query item's 'Usage' property from 'Attribute' to 'Fact' will automatically change its 'Regular Aggregate' property to 'Sum'.
A model contains a time dimension with keys for Day, Month, and Year. This dimension joins to a Sales fact table with a `Day_Key` and a Sales Forecast fact table with a `Month_Key`. Without proper configuration, queries combining sales and forecast data will cause the monthly forecast values to be repeated for every day of the month, leading to incorrect summaries. Which feature must be configured on the time dimension query subject to prevent this?
A report that joins the 'Customer' and 'Sales' query subjects is unexpectedly generating a cross-product (Cartesian join) instead of the expected inner join, causing extremely long query times and incorrect results. What is the most likely cause of this issue within the Framework Manager model?
A BI team needs to implement dynamic filtering based on a user's region and also support multi-lingual report titles. For example, a filter should be `[Region] = 'USA'` for one user, and a report title should be 'Sales Report' for English users and 'Rapport des Ventes' for French users. Which Framework Manager features are best suited to manage these lists of values centrally? (Select TWO)
A logistics company is modeling shipment data. The model contains a `Shipments` fact table (at the package level) and dimension tables for `Origin Port` and `Destination Port`. Analysts need to report on the number of shipments between any two ports. However, the `Origin Port` and `Destination Port` dimensions are structurally identical, based on the same `Ports` database table. This is a classic role-playing dimension scenario. What is the recommended modeling technique in Framework Manager to handle this?
What is the primary advantage of creating a stand-alone calculation in Framework Manager's business view, as opposed to embedding the calculation logic directly within a model query subject?
A financial model contains sensitive query subjects, such as `EmployeeSalaries` and `ExecutiveBonuses`, that should only be visible to users in the `HumanResources` security group. All other users should not even be aware these query subjects exist when authoring reports. What is the correct method to implement this requirement?
A manufacturing company's data model in Framework Manager has become extremely large and complex over several years. It contains over 500 query subjects sourced from a single enterprise data warehouse. The `project.cpf` file is now over 100MB, causing Framework Manager to be very slow to open, validate, and publish the model. **Current State:** - One monolithic model for all business areas (Sales, Inventory, Production). - Slow performance for modelers during development and maintenance. - High risk when publishing, as a change in one area could impact others. **Goal:** - Improve modeler productivity and reduce performance bottlenecks. - De-couple the different business areas to allow for more agile development cycles. - Maintain the ability for users to create cross-functional reports (e.g., Sales vs. Inventory). What is the most effective architectural strategy to refactor this model for better maintainability and performance?
10 more free samples are waiting
Create a free account to unlock the whole C2090-632 sample bank, or get full access to all 207 practice questions in the simulator.